What is the
Difference between auditing and assurance?
Assurance is “Give an independent opinion regarding
information, made by one party behalf of another party.” I will describe this, I think if you don’t
know about this subject can’t understand.
Normally management is preparing financial statements, but
beneficial parties don’t accept that accounts so independent party gives an
assurance that these financial statements free from material misstatements.
Then the beneficial parties accept that.
So I think you got the idea what I said. But auditors don’t
give fully assurance because auditors look
sample basis transactions,
Inherent weakness of internal control,
Audit Evidence is
more persuasive than conclusive.
High judgmental involvement.
Involvement of estimates
If you get assurance is house, audit named person lives
inside the house.
There are two types of assurance
1.
Audit
2.
Analytical Reviews
Audit is you normally know and I described in previous
articles.
In an audit, an auditor gives a Reasonable assurance and in
Analytical Reviews auditors give limited assurance.
Benefits of assurance
Enhance the creditability of information
Reduce risk of management bias
Attention on weakness of information
I described that there are reasonable assurance and limited
assurance; I will describe it as follows
CRITERIA Reasonable
ASSURANCE Limited
assurance
Evidence Taking sufficient
and appropriate sufficient
and relevant
Risk on Task low High
Conclusion Positive negative
Assurance high Middle/Low
What are the Elements of Assurance?
Parties
1)
Chartered accountant(Independent Auditor)
2)
Responsibility Party(Management)
3)
Beneficial Party.(Share Holders , Government ,Tax
Department)
Subject Matter
Suitable Criteria
Sufficient appropriate evidence to support conclusion
Report
No comments:
Post a Comment